St. Pio’ Prophecy on Christians’ homelands, NWO Rockefeller’s Abortion law and Masons war
by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
First poublished on Genuary, 12, 2020 – republished on September, 23, anniversary of Saint Pio
VERSIONE ORIGINALE IN ITALIANO
«I hate sin! Fortunate our country, if it, mother of law, wanted to perfect its laws and customs in this sense in the light of honesty and Christian principles».
(Saint Pius from Pietrelcina)
These words were certainly pronounced by italian Friar Pio before 1959, the date of the publication of the volume which contains its pearls of Christian and Catholic wisdom, but above all human and social, so current as to appear prophetic. I read them today, for a certainly divine inspiration, in the diary “Good Day … A thought for every day of the year” from the special edition for the beatification of 1999 by the Apulian Franciscan then canonized by John Paul II in 2002.
Francesco Forgione (Pietrelcina, Benevento, 25 May 1887 – San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, 23 September 1968), appears suited to the Minor Order founded by the St. Franciscus from Assisi since his baptism by virtue of the name, which in order to adhere to the monastic life changed Pio (Pius), keeping faith with the meaning of this denomination with his works of spritual and material mercy and with his religious devotion beyond all ecclesiastical persecution.
The friar of the Stigmata of the Passion of Christ, painful and bleeding for fifty years, was a Capuchin Franciscan much loved and equally disputed, not so much for the ways at times a little rough with the sinners from vacillating repentance or the “Gospel- do-it-yourself ”, as much as for his love for the truth expressed with clear sincerity and luminous simplicity.
This virtue has always been the most opposed in the history of the world, as the sacrifices of St. John the Baptist and Jesus Crucified recall, guilty of denouncing the moral corruption of their times, not sparing powerful as Herod Antipas or religious congregations such as the Pharisees. It also arouses curiosity, even for those who are devoted to me, to read the enlightened words of Saint Pius who in a very concise phrase mention themes that have become increasingly rebounding today such as country, law, laws, customs, honesty and, above all, Christian principles.
His brief thought is even more stentorian in this Third Millennium in which the Catholic Church is also slowly sliding towards the drift of other confessions such as the Lutheran Protestant which, in order to hold onto the faithful sinners, has come to annihilate two thousand years of social doctrine Judeo-Christian accepting homosexual unions banned as an abomination from the Old Testament to the Letters of St. Paul to the Corinthians.
SAINT PAUL’S LETTER ABOUT HOMOXESUALITY
Being a man of refined culture Saul di Tarsus knew well the perverse inclinations widespread in the Hellenistic world where pedophilia was a habitual practice especially in the form of pederasty, another name of sodomy with very young boys.
«Don’t you know that the unrighteous will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Don’t be deceived! Neither the impure, nor the idolaters, nor the adulterers, nor the effeminate (malakoi), nor the homosexuals (arsenokoitai), nor the thieves, nor the misers, nor the drunkards, nor the abusers, nor the robbers, will inherit the Kingdom of God (1 Cor. 6,9-10) “.
I do not write these things to discriminate or abhor homosexuals, it is clear, but only to admonish them as “brothers” in Christian terms on the content of the Holy Scriptures. Therefore, I am writing to you why never a Church that dares to call itself Christian can “justify” such a sin as it cannot legitimize idolatry (true Josè Maria Bergoglio?), Adultery, thievery, intoxication, robbery, slander and greed for material goods.
From Vienna to Malmo: LGBT and satanists’s show into the European Christian churches
Moreover, Paul’s words do not echo as a severe anathema but as a thoughtful warning. The last of the apostles (he chose the name of Paulus because in Latin means small), in his affectionate epistolary “caritas” does not use the grim warnings of the Son of God.
«Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You give a tenth of your spices—mint, dill and cumin. But you have neglected the more important matters of the law—justice, mercy and faithfulness. You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former. You blind guides! You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel. Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence. Blind Pharisee! First clean the inside of the cup and dish, and then the outside also will be clean. Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of the bones of the dead and of all putridume. In the same way, on the outside you appear to people as righteous but on the inside you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity (Matthew, 23,23-28)».
This condemnation is reserved by the Messiah to priesthoods, that is, to those who have a special “gift”: the management of the Holy Temple and the Holy Scriptures. While Paul simply warns sinners that in so doing they will not enter the Kingdom of God but do not prescribe public pillory or stoning.
To clear the field of any misunderstanding about homosexuality as about the concept of divorce is Jesus Christ himself in the quotation from the Gospel of Matthew 10, 5 responding to the Pharisees on the question of repudiating his wife: «For the hardness of your heart he wrote for you this rule. But from the beginning of creation he made them male and female; for this the man will leave his father and mother and join his wife and the two will become one flesh. So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore man does not divide what God has joined».
Today’s words of Saint Pius, reported precisely in the thought of November 24, really open the Pandora’s Box of the evils of the world. Let us carefully re-read his sentence: «I hate sin! Fortunate our country, if it, mother of law, wanted to perfect its laws and customs in this sense in the light of honesty and Christian principles».
FROM THE SIN OF ADULTERY TO DIVORCE IN ITALY
“I hate sin” is the fulcrum of the gospel teaching of Jesus Christ and of the Magisterium of the Catholic Church: to hate sin but not the sinner. And above all be ready to welcome him when he is in sincere repentance of his sins. What did Jesus say to Magdalene?
«You are forgiven. Go and sin no more». What he said to the stoners of the adulteress: “Who among you is without sin, throw the first stone”. But this does not mean, as interpreted by some raving homilist, that the woman who betrayed her husband was a “poor woman” to be pardoned superficially.
It simply means that no one had the right to put her to death for her sins: only God can decide the fate of a human being’s life because he is the only one capable of truly reading in his heart the repentance and the desire for repentance. The Gospel therefore teaches us not to condemn and also exhorts us not to judge: «Do not judge and you will not be judged; do not condemn and you will not be condemned; forgive and you will be forgiven (Luke 6:37) ».
But Jesus is equally rigorous in reiterating the condemnation of sin: “Now, if your brother has sinned against you, go and take him back between you and him alone; if he listens to you, you have earned your brother; but if he does not listen to you, take one or two people with you, so that each word is confirmed by the mouth of two or three witnesses. If he refuses to listen to them, tell the church; and if he refuses to listen to the church, both for you as the pagan and the tax collector (Matthew 18,15-17) ».
After pointing out his hatred for sin, the friar of San Giovanni Rotondo commends Italy as the mother of law, in reference to Roman jurisprudence, thus placing it in a role of historical and world privilege, in a great act of devotion, also institutional towards the nation of which Saint Francis is patron.
Finally, there is the wish that he can perfect his laws and customs in the light of honesty and Christian principles. The more I re-read these sentences, the more truly apocalyptically prophetic they appear to me.
Pio da Petrelcina assumes this name becoming a Capuchin Franciscan on January 22, 1903, at only sixteen; seven years later, on 10 August 1910, he was consecrated a priest. In 1916 he was transferred to San Giovanni Rotondo, on the Gargano, and here, in the convent of S. Maria delle Grazie, an extraordinary adventure of thaumaturge and apostle of the confessional began for Father Pio.
On September 20, 1918, the cappuccino received the stigmata of the Passion of Christ which remained open, painful and bleeding for fifty years: until his death. arrived on September 23, 1968, at the age of 81, when they disappear from his body (his complete hagiography at the bottom of the page).
Two years later, the National Law 898 of 1 December 1970 (confirmed by the 1974 referendum) sanctions the right to divorce which represents the first step of disintegration of the family, the cradle of the Christian biblical tradition and millennia before the Jewish tradition, a hearth of charity but also protective fortress of children.
BAMBINI AUTISTICI “CAVIE” NELLA CLINICA TRANSGENDER col farmaco gratis in Italia
In the daily chronicles we now see the evident consequences of social destabilization that that norm has produced: abuse of minors, children disputed between spouses, violence against women (and also on men) accentuated by traumatic separations, often for futile reasons, often also the result of complaints made up for a faster divorce, as attested by distinguished marriage lawyers. Paladins of the right to separation can stun us with a flood of words, but the negative results are these …
ABORTION IN THE USA IMPOSED BY ROCKEFELLER
In the same year 1970, Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller (Bar Harbor, 8 July 1908 – New York City, 26 January 1979), third son of John Davison Rockefeller Jr, the only heir of the homonymous patriarch of the Standard Oil family, during his tenure as New York Governor passed the first American bill to legalize abortion.
Precisely this choice, considered too liberal within the Republican Party, prevented him three times from winning the primaries for the presidential elections, forcing him to settle for being then appointed vice president of the United States (1974-1976). But he was proud to the point of vetoing another bill that would restore the ban on abortion. This is his official statement: “I don’t think it’s right for a group to impose its vision of morality on an entire society.”
The New World Order theorem was beginning to appear forcefully on the international scene, like a wolf in sheep’s clothing, even under the guise of spiritual effervescence. As Reverend Philip E. Wheaton’s review of the book “In Thy Will Be Done: The Conquest of the Amazon: Nelson Rockefeller and Evangelism in the Age of Oil (1996)” well written by Gerard Colby and Charlotte Dennett explains.
Colby and Dennett document how Nelson Rockefeller and the largest American missionary organization worked with the United States and foreign governments to secure resources (oil, etc.) in Latin America and “pacify” indigenous peoples in the name of democracy, corporate profit and religion, causing massacres and genocides. Wheaton states: “Thy Will Be Done provides the American people with an illuminating framework for understanding the machinations of corporate interests and how the Rockefellers have exploited sincere spiritual motivation in their search for profits and power.”
Nelson Rockfeller, in addition to being the great financier of the Italian entrepreneur Bernardo Caprotti in the project of the Esselunga supermarket chain, was a trusted man in the Coordination of Inter-American affairs and protégé of the 33rd degree Freemason Franklin Delano Roosvelt, former Governor of New York and US president from 1933 to 1945..
Further, iI shouldn’t be forgotten that Freemasonry was strongly rooted in North America thanks also to the intense propaganda activity of its “black pope” or the Southerner General Albert Pike, suspected of being an occultist and Satanist as well as among the founders of the Ku Klux Klan.
During the long “reign” of the brother Roosvelt the American Allies landed in Sicily with the help of the international relations of the Masonry of the Supreme Council of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite (with a mother lodge in Washington and headquarters in Palermo) and the support of the mafia families forced to flee overseas from the hunt for gangs launched by the prefect Cesare Mori by order of the leader Benito Mussolini.
EXCOMMUNICATION OF THE FREEMASONS AND THE ANTI-CHRISTIAN LAWS
Mussolini, on the other hand, on February 11, 1929, aware of the criminal intent of international Freemasonry, had signed the Lateran Pacts between the Kingdom of Italy and the Holy See for the institution of Vatican City and the reopening of dialogue between the Italy and the Pope interrupted in 1870 for the breach of Porta Pia, or the armed raid in the Papal States hatched by the same Anglo-Italian Freemasons who appropriated the capital after having united Italy in blood with the landing in Sicily of the Thousand troops of Freemason Giuseppe Garibaldi financed by notables of the Grand Lodge of England such as Henry Jonh Temple, III viscount of Palmerston.
http://www.gospanews.net/2018/11/04/lopinione-iv-novembre-onore-ai-caduti-del-grande-inganno/
In 1884 Pope Leo XIII promulgated the encyclical Humanus Genus with the excommunication of Freemasonry. A handful of years later Ernest Nathan, grandson of those who gave asylum in London to the Freemason Giuseppe Mazzini, a terrorist wanted throughout Europe since 1848, became the first non-aristocratic Mayor of Rome after being Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Italy, the the nation’s most important Masonic consortium.
It is reasonable to believe that the good Padre Pio had no knowledge of all these puzzling historical interconnections that are easy to reconstruct today thanks to the internet.
And it even seems terrible to think that divorce in Italy and abortion in the US, two of the main scars to Christian morality, were launched in 1970: exactly 100 years after the treacherous assault on the Papal States. Look as a giant plot more than a coincidence…
On May 22, 1978, the Italian Republic also transposed the law for the termination of pregnancy which, according to ProLife and ProVita, caused at least 6 million deaths with an evident weight on the demographic decrease. This happened only ten years after the death of the Franciscan of Pietrelcina who hoped that his motherland of the law would perfect his «laws and customs in the light of honesty and Christian principles».
While due to diametrically opposed regulations these days Gospa News has told the story of a Christian girl from Florence bombed with powerful psychotropic drugs to which she is intolerant and then forced to abort against her will.
On June 5, 2016, Parliament approved the law on Civil Unions which legalizes the rights of homosexual couples strongly desired by the majority of the Democratic Party government and immediately signed without hesitation by the President of the Republic Sergio Mattarella, in spite of the boasted Catholic faith of this last and of various exponents of the PD.
Tre pupazzi nel Luna-Park del DEEP STATE-CIA alla canna del gas in Libia
DIVINE PUNISHMENT AND SARACEN’S MARTYR
In the autumn of 2016, the Dominican Father Giovanni Cavalcoli was dismissed from Radio Maria and put to the shame by many clergymen for claiming that the terromoti in Italy were a divine punishment for this political act. Interviewed by the Daily Faith, as a coherent theologian, he adjusted the form but not the substance: «I was not referring to the law in the strict sense, but to some vices and sinful and unruly behaviors such as sodomy. God sends the punishment to the one who sins by realizing what he does, knowing that he deliberately goes against the law of God».
If Padre Pio were still alive he would certainly have proved him right …
I wrote this reflection on November 24 and therefore the thought also goes to the saint of the day: Flora of Cordova, martyr of the Catholic Church killed on November 24 851 during the Saracen occupation by order of a Qadi, a Muslim magistrate, to whom she had delivered spontaneously to testify to his Christian faith while knowing that he would face death.
«In Córdova in Andalusia in Spain, saints Flora and Maria, virgins and martyrs, who during the persecution of the Moors were thrown into prison together with Saint Eulogus and then pierced with the sword» says the Roman Martyrology.
«She was born in Islamic Spain, from a Muslim father and a Christian mother. Once her father died, she was educated in Christianity together with her sister Baldegoto but was opposed by her Muslim brother. He escaped for the first time from his birthplace to return there since his brother had imprisoned religious and clerics to blackmail her. When she returned she was brutally beaten. He left home again for years and returned by martyrdom – says Wikipedia – It was said that his body, after being thrown into the fields and respected by the beasts that did not feed on it, was thrown into the Guadalquivir river».
After more than a thousand years, that of Santa Flora da Cordova remains a terrible story that in Italy and in today’s Europe, just like the words of Saint Pio, really evokes apocalyptic visions and the diabolical ghosts of the New World Order: that Deep International You have been able to bring together the most radical extremists among Sunni Islamists, Ashkenazi Zionists and Western Freemasons, in support of wars in the Middle East and coups in Asia and Latin America.
Just like the operations in South America in which the pioneer of abortion in the United States was specialized.
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
© COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS
no reproduction wihtout authorzation
MAIN SOURCES
ST. PIO BIOGRAPHY INSIDE ITALIAN POST
GOSPA NEWS – FREEMASONRY AND PLOTS’ INVESTIGATIONS
GOSPA NEWS – CHRISTIANS PERSECUTED REPORTS
This is what happens when a christian weds the abominations of those that call themselves jews.
Guys, please stop mentioning the “judeo-christian” culture… this is a brainwash coning from the jewish luciferian cabalists of the synagogue of satan.
Judaism is not the ancient Mosaic Law, but pharisaism passed down through generations until today… Judaism is talmudism, is communism and luciferian cabala.
Jacob Neusner, eminent talmudic scholar:
– “Theologically and historically, there is no such thing as the judeo-christian tradition. It’s a secular myth favoured by people who are not really believers themselves.”
Rabbi Eliezar Berkowitz, chairman of the department of jewish philosophy at the Hebrew Theological College, in religious journal ‘Judaism’, winter 1966:
– “As to dialogue in the purely theological sense, nothing could be more fruitless or pointless. Judaism is judaism because it rejects christianity; and christianity is christianity because it rejects judaism. What is usually referred to as the jewish-christian traditions exists only in christian or secularist fantasy.”
Joshua Jehouda, a prominent french jewish leader, “L’Antisemitisme Miroir du Monde“, observed in the late 1950s:
“The current expression ‘judaeo-christian’ is an error which has altered the course of universal history by the confusion it has sown in men’s minds, if by it one is meant to understand the jewish origin of christianity… If the term ‘judaeo-christian’ does point to a common origin, there is no doubt that it is a most dangerous idea. It is based on a ‘contradictio in abjecto‘ which has set the path of history on the wrong track. It links in one breath two ideas which are completely irreconcilable, it seeks to demonstrate that there is no difference between day and night or hot and cold or black and white, and thus introduces a fatal element of confusion to a basis on which some, nevertheless, are endeavouring to construct a civilisation.”
National Jewish Information Service:
– “The rabbis of judaism understand this just as do the leaders in the christian movement. Rabbi Moshe Maggal of the National jewish Information Service said in 1961 when the term judeo-christian was relatively new, “There is no such thing as a judeo-christian religion. We consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other.”
Rabbi Moshe M. Maggal, president of National Jewish Information Service, letter, 21 august 1961:
– “…you will notice the great difference between the jewish and christian religions. But these are not all. We consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other. …we emphasized that there is no such thing as a judeo-christian religion. There is not any similarity between the two concepts.”
The Jewish World, march 15th, 1924:
– “The strongest supporters of judaism cannot deny that judaism is anti-christian.”
Jewish World, 15th march, 1923:
– “Fundamentally judaism versus christianity is anti-christian.”
Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal, New York, july-september 1932, p. 105:
– “The russian intelligentsia… saw in the philosophy of judaism the germs of bolshevism – the struggle of… Judaism versus christianity.”
Michael Wax, Jewish author, 2006 book on yiddish language:
– “The jews are not merely out of step with christian civilization, they hold it with utter contempt.”
Dr. Gordon Ginn, an american christian scholar, made a very valid point when he noted:
– “It is most interesting, indeed, that rabbis as well as jewish scholars such as Mamlak and White agree with orthodox, historical christianity that ‘judeo-christian’ is a contradiction in terms, even though that truth is yet to be discovered by contemporary evangelical and fundamentalist christians” (Smyrna, August, 1993).
Newspeak, :
– “For scholars of american religion, the idea of a single judeo-christian tradition is a made-in-america myth that many of them no longer regard as valid.” Newsweek cites authorities who indicate that “the idea of a common judeo-christian tradition first surfaced at the end of the 19th century but did not gain popular support until the 1940s, as part of an american reaction to nazism”, and concludes that “Since then, both jewish and christian scholars have come to recognize that – geopolitics apart – judaism and christianity are different, even rival religions.”
Please read the Gospels better 🙂
Gospael of Saint Luke – 2
The Birth of Jesus
2 In those days Caesar Augustus issued a decree that a census should be taken of the entire Roman world. 2 (This was the first census that took place while[a] Quirinius was governor of Syria.) 3 And everyone went to their own town to register.
4 So Joseph also went up from the town of Nazareth in Galilee to Judea, to Bethlehem the town of David, because he belonged to the house and line of David. 5 He went there to register with Mary, who was pledged to be married to him and was expecting a child. 6 While they were there, the time came for the baby to be born, 7 and she gave birth to her firstborn, a son. She wrapped him in cloths and placed him in a manger, because there was no guest room available for them.
8 And there were shepherds living out in the fields nearby, keeping watch over their flocks at night. 9 An angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were terrified. 10 But the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid. I bring you good news that will cause great joy for all the people. 11 Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is the Messiah, the Lord. 12 This will be a sign to you: You will find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger.”
13 Suddenly a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying,
14 “Glory to God in the highest heaven,
and on earth peace to those on whom his favor rests.”
15 When the angels had left them and gone into heaven, the shepherds said to one another, “Let’s go to Bethlehem and see this thing that has happened, which the Lord has told us about.”
16 So they hurried off and found Mary and Joseph, and the baby, who was lying in the manger. 17 When they had seen him, they spread the word concerning what had been told them about this child, 18 and all who heard it were amazed at what the shepherds said to them. 19 But Mary treasured up all these things and pondered them in her heart. 20 The shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all the things they had heard and seen, which were just as they had been told.
21 On the eighth day, when it was time to circumcise the child, he was named Jesus, the name the angel had given him before he was conceived.