“TRUMP’S PLAN TO DEFEAT RUSSIA IN UKRAINE!”. Former State Secretary (ex CIA) Pompeo’ Shocking Article. Kremlin Reactions
![“TRUMP’S PLAN TO DEFEAT RUSSIA IN UKRAINE!”. Former State Secretary (ex CIA) Pompeo’ Shocking Article. Kremlin Reactions](http://www.gospanews.net/en/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Mike-Pompep-Donald-Trump.jpg)
In the cover image, former CIA Director and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo together with then President Donald Trump
Introduction by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
Winds of global war in leopard spots are anticipated by a man trusted by Donald Trump in the event that, as is likely after the withdrawal of challenger Joseph Biden, he becomes president of the United States of America again.
The article published in the Wall Street Journal contains shocking and disturbing details on how to defeat Russia in Ukraine, while Russian President Vladimir Putin expected the start of serious peace negotiations, and how to reduce the threat of Iran in the Middle East.contains shocking and disturbing details on how to defeat Russia in Ukraine, while Russian President Vladimir Putin expected the start of serious peace negotiations, and how to reduce the threat of Iran in the Middle East.
VANCE & TRUMP… Two Hard Zionists for Ongoing Israeli Genocide in Gaza
According to what was written by his former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, former director of American counterintelligence CIA, Trump, even before taking office, is ready to strengthen the US war strategies in various conflict zones rather than loosen them with peace agreements.
«Pundits claim that if Donald Trump is re-elected, he will cut off aid to Ukraine, give away its territory, and deal directly with Vladimir Putin to impose an ignominious “peace” on the country. There’s no evidence that such capitulation will be part of President Trump’s policy and much evidence to the contrary» . Thus begins the article by Pompeo and another former Trump adviser, David J. Urban, on WSJ.
This had already become clear to us in recent days with the official nomination of Republican Senator James David Vance as a candidate for the vice presidency. The choice of a staunch Zionist like Trump himself was immediately also overshadowed by the shady business deals that Vance has started in the field of gene therapy together with Battelle, one of the most important contractors of the US Pentagon already very active in the bacteriological laboratories opened in Ukraine by the former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, also a former director of the CIA, during the Obama-Biden administration.
So the will of the Weapons Lobby seems to already take shape in global strategies. For now, all we can do is hope that Trump himself will contradict his former Secretary of State Pompeo…
Possible Trump Ukraine plan: half a trillion dollars and NATO membership
Could this be Trump’s plan for establishing peace in Ukraine and Europe?
Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and David J. Urban, a former advisor to Trump’s campaigns in 2016 and 2020, published an article last night in the Wall Street Journal, outlining what might be the Republican administration’s plan if Trump is elected president. Israel is also mentioned in the plan.
According to the authors, “While Mr. Biden stumbled into war through weakness, Mr. Trump could re-establish peace through strength.”
So what is required to achieve said peace? The authors list seven steps:
• Unleash America’s energy potential. This will fire up the U.S. economy, drive down prices and shrink Mr. Putin’s war-crimes budget.
• Rebuild ties with Saudi Arabia and Israel and work together against Iran. This will stabilize the Middle East, ease the Gaza crisis, and create an opening for the Saudis to join the U.S. in squeezing Russia out of global energy markets.
• Impose real sanctions on Russia. The Biden administration’s sanctions sound good on paper but are hollow. The Treasury, for example, exempts Russian banks from U.S. sanctions if their transactions are related to energy production—the most important revenue source for the Kremlin’s war machine.
WEAPONS LOBBY – 16. Big Five US Arms Makers Profit From Ukraine Conflict and Overcharge Pentagon
• Bulk up America’s defense industry. We must show our adversaries, especially Russia and China, that they can’t compete with U.S. defense capabilities. Russia’s economy is smaller than Texas’. We can’t allow China to match and surpass the U.S.
• Revitalize the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. This includes making Europeans pay their fair share. It is time to raise the bar on spending to 3% of member countries’ gross domestic product.
• Create a $500 billion “lend-lease” program for Ukraine. Instead of saddling U.S. taxpayers with more bills, let Ukraine borrow as much as it needs to buy American weapons to defeat Russia. This is how we helped Britain in World War II before Pearl Harbor. It’s how we can send a clear signal to Mr. Putin that he will never win.
Lift all restrictions on the type of weapons Ukraine can obtain and use. This will re-establish a position of strength, which Mr. Putin will understand means the war must end. He will face rising costs and no chance of further gain.
According to the authors, these steps would “position Mr. Trump to set the terms of a deal: The war stops immediately. Ukraine builds up substantial defense forces so Russia never attacks again. No one recognizes Russia’s occupation and claimed annexation of any Ukrainian territories – just as we never recognized the Soviet incorporation of the Baltic states and withheld recognition from East Germany until 1974. Crimea is demilitarized. Ukraine rebuilds with reparations from Russia’s frozen central-bank reserves, not U.S. taxpayer dollars. Ukraine joins NATO as soon as possible so all European allies assume the burden of protecting it. NATO should establish a $100 billion fund for arming Ukraine, with the U.S. share capped at 20%, as is the case with other alliance common budgets. The European Union should swiftly admit Ukraine and help it modernize and develop its economy.”
And what about Russia? “If Russia complies with these terms, the West will gradually lift sanctions. They will be fully removed once Ukraine is in both NATO and the EU.” Pompeo and Urban state that “these steps, and not the half-measures of the Biden administration, will end the war, establish a lasting peace, ensure Europe bears the burden of maintaining it, and re-establish freedom and security on the Continent.”
“For those who doubt,” the authors conclude, “The last thing Mr. Trump wants in a second term is a foreign-policy failure that distracts from his domestic agenda and makes Mr. Biden’s botched withdrawal from Afghanistan look like a success in comparison.”
The article was published amid growing concerns about the cessation of American aid to Kyiv if Trump wins the election. Pompeo and Urban also address this, claiming there is “no basis to the pundits’ claims” that Trump will stop the aid, demand Kyiv to cede territories, and together with Putin impose a “shameful peace.”
However, these concerns did not arise from nothing. Trump himself has not said anything substantive about the war except that “it needs to end,” promising “to end it within 24 hours,” and making statements about Ukraine facing a war machine that already defeated Napoleon and Hitler, in an interview with Fox.
But security experts around him have spoken to Politico, Reuters, and the Washington Post, and what they proposed definitely included the possibility of coercing Ukraine to give up territories and even not accepting NATO membership. Moreover, Trump’s choice of J.D. Vance, an opponent of aid to Ukraine, as his vice president is noteworthy: he is known as an opponent of continued aid to Kyiv.
Therefore, it can be assessed that the article is evidence of struggles to shape Trump’s foreign policy and an attempt to draw him to the authors’ side.
Trump has complex relations with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. On one hand, in 2017, he lifted the embargo on supplying Javelin anti-tank missiles, which the Biden administration provided in large quantities at the outbreak of the war. Last spring, he gave the green light to lifting the Republicans’ prolonged opposition in the House of Representatives to provide a $61 billion aid package to Ukraine.
On the other hand, during 2019, Trump delayed transferring aid to Kyiv until Zelensky agreed to his demand to investigate conspiracies, which would have hurt Joe Biden, then the Democratic presidential candidate. Only after Trump’s pressures were leaked did he release the aid. The House of Representatives impeached Trump over the affair, but the Senate acquitted him, and he remained in office
Originally published by Israel Hayom
DEEP STATE Could Take ‘Another Shot’ at Trump – Two Former US Officials
UKRAINEGATE, CIA-DEEP STATE’S PLOT AGAINST TRUMP with two whistleblowers and Italian ties