WUHAN-GATES – 36. “SARS-Cov-2 Laboratory Accident?”. Us Intelligence and MIT Review validated Manmade Virus’ Theory
“Trickery succeeds sometimes, but it always commits suicide”
(Gibran Khalil Gibran)
by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
Versione originale in Italiano
The SARS-Cov-2 virus may have come out of a laboratory. To admit it, this time, is the head of the most important secret services in the world: the American ones. But she is also an old acquaintance of Gospa News who in four different inquiries and in the book WuhanGates defined her as the “prophetess of the pandemic” for predicting a terrible Coronavirus respiratory disease during a conference in 2018, having called for a “world order” (evocative of the NWO) and having led the suspected Event 201 drill, on a simulated planetary contagion, funded, among others, by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
On April 14, Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines revealed that after over a year of determined sleuthing, US spying agencies had no concrete answers on basic questions regarding the origins of the 2019 coronavirus.
“It is absolutely accurate the intelligence community does not know exactly where, when, or how Covid-19 virus was transmitted initially,” Haines told members of the Senate Intelligence Committee. “Components have coalesced around two alternative theories, these scenarios are it emerged naturally from human contact with infected animals, or it was a laboratory accident.”
INTELLIGENCE AND THE LABORATORY VIRUS
To report the sensational statements of the head of the ODNI, the office that coordinates the entire US Intelligence Community on which 17 federal agencies depend, including the most powerful on earth such as Central Intelligence Agency CIA (civil counter-espionage) and National Security Agency NSA (the 007 military) was the German investigative journalist Kit Klarenberg in an excellent article on Russia Today in which the history of the pandemic was reconstructed through intelligence and science analyzes.
The admission, even if only hypothetical of the ‘laboratory leak’ (a more moderate theory than that of an intentional release that emerged during our 45 reportages on the subject), is a sensational revelation for three reasons. Firstly, because the lawyer Haines, long-time Democrat wanted by Joseph Biden at the top of American intelligence and appointed by the Senate the day after the inauguration of the new president in the White House, confirms the allegations of the SARS-Cov-2 built artificially launched by former President Donald Trump, immediately accused of conspiracy by the Dems themselves.
The second reason is detailed by the reporter himself. «This time last year, Donald Trump alleged he’d seen evidence confirming covid was laboratory-made and, throughout 2020, former MI6 chief Richard Dearlove also claimed the virus was “an engineered escapee” from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Haines’ public admission that a “laboratory accident” is a possible explanation is significant because intelligence services have thus far been quick to dismiss the suggestion as a conspiracy theory whenever it’s been aired in public. In response to Trump’s statement for example, the Director of National Intelligence’s office (Haines’ predecessor – ed) firmly refuted the idea Covid-19 was “manmade or genetically modified.” Of course, the virus could be neither and still have escaped from a lab».
Finally, this revelation is more important for what it hides than for what it reveals. Ironically, Klarenberg, in fact, in his conclusion recalls what the USA has allocated for his spy agencies: «One would hope that between the WHO, grossly overpaid US intelligence services ($85 billion last year), and millions of independent researchers the world over, the truth may one day emerge. But one shouldn’t hold one’s breath. When powerful people have a vested interest in suppressing inconvenient facts, secrets can be kept forever, and that’s without factoring in the cottage industry that has emerged dedicated to stigmatizing laboratory accident explanations for the pandemic».
FROM THE CIA TO A PROPHETESS OF THE PANDEMIC
One of the secrets wisely hidden by the Director of National Intelligence is her undoubted knowledge of the Coronaviruses that led her to make that prophecy about the imminent pandemic emergency in a conference in Camdem in 2018, three years after the same prediction made by Bil Gates in the transmission TED, and a year before Biden’s, in autumn 2019, in the middle of the election campaign.
Haines, in fact, was deputy director of the CIA (and later deputy national security adviser to the White House) during the years in which the Obama-Biden administration, together with the Gates foundation, financed the dangerous experiments on superviruses with the viral charges enhanced by the Gain of Function for “dual use” purposes (vaccine and bioweapon) in the laboratories of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and North Carolina University in Chapel Hill. But she is also a great expert in biological weapons, so much so that she is a consultant on this sector for NTI (Nuclear Threat Initiative), a non-profit and bipartisan organization (although founded by former Senator Dem Sam Nunn).
A response to the darkness in which US intelligence gropes – or pretends to grope – in the face of a “pandemic planned for decades by Gates”, as claimed by lawyer Robert F. Kennedy, orphan of his father, attorney general and uncle JFK , both murdered in mysterious circumstances in the shadow of the intrigues of the Deep State (international potentate between Zionist politicians, Freemasons and military 007), was clearly given by another great expert in counterintelligence.
Retired Lieutenant Colonel Dr. Dany Shoham, microbiologist and expert in chemical and biological warfare in the Middle East, former senior intelligence analyst Aman of the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) and the Israeli Ministry of Defense had in fact published an alarming article on the website of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, where he is research associate. Strengthened by his scientific experience, he wrote unequivocal sentences about SARS-Cov-2.
«This debate is very complicated and contains the potential for explosive revelations on many levels, but intelligence communities around the world have stayed largely silent on the matter.This is both intriguing and unsurprising. Several Western countries, as well as Russia, India, Japan, and Australia, had formed intelligence estimates as early as January 2020 but kept their conclusions quiet. The very persistence of intelligence agencies’ silence implies that they judge the initial contagion to have been unnatural. Had they concluded that the pandemic resulted from a natural contagion, they would probably have made that conclusion public» highlighted on Best Shoham.
DANGEROUS EXPERIMENTS IN CHINA AND USA
The considerations of journalist Klarenberg proceed on the same wavelength in his intriguing article which bears only the very serious omission of the obvious role of Gates and the CIA in virus research experiments.
«While the World Health Organization (WHO) is yet to comment on Haines’ seeming change of heart, the lab theory stands in stark contrast with the agency’s long-held public position. In March, it issued a report, based on the findings of an international team of scientists who spent four weeks in Wuhan probing covid’s origins. They concluded that of all the various explanations, a laboratory leak was by far and away the least likely. For many though, the report raised far more questions than it answered. Even WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was critical of the team’s investigation – his response to the scientists’ public presentation of their findings was measured yet withering».
«The team…visited several laboratories in Wuhan and considered the possibility that the virus entered the human population as a result of a laboratory incident. I do not believe this assessment was extensive enough – he said – Further data and studies will be needed to reach more robust conclusions… this requires further investigation, potentially with additional missions involving specialist experts, which I am ready to deploy».
«That their investigation of the laboratory leak theory was so undercooked is particularly striking given the only US-based representative on the team, Peter Daszak, is President of EcoHealth Alliance, which has in recent years conducted extensive work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)» noted RT’s reporter evoking the name of the Anglo-American zoologist who ended up at the center of at least five Gospa News inquiries before ending up in the crosshairs of international newspapers such as the Daily Mail and Die Velt precisely for his macroscopic conflict of interest: as he was called to investigate a Coronavirus manipulated in Wuhan as in Chapel Hill thanks to the generous funding of EHA, a New York NGO sponsored among others by a well-known vaccine manufacturer such as Johson & Johnson.
But among the partners of EHA there is also King Saudi University, the first public university in the kingdom, founded in 1957 by King Saud bin Abdulaziz right in the capital and equipped with a prestigious College of Pharmacy. It is one of the most renowned universities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which, in turn, financed the global immunization plan of the Global Health Security Agenda promoted by Obama and Gates and culminated with the pilot project of 12 compulsory vaccines in age schoolchildren in Italy, thanks to which the multinational GlaxoSmithKline (also strong of its subsidiary GSK Saudi Arabia) has been enriched and of which the current WHO deputy director Ranieri Guerra was scientific ambassador for the Renzi government.
THE BIG CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OF THE LANCET’S GURU
Daszak enjoys such great prestige in the international scientific community that he was called by The Lancet to lead the WHO-like commission on the origin of the SARS-Cov-2 virus although its implications with the Wuhan laboratory are known. Russia Today’s investigation goes into detail.
«For one, he’s a close friend and ardent supporter of Shi Zhengli, director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at WIV, who has been repeatedly forced to deny her lab was the source of coronavirus. In June 2020, Scientific American described the pair as “long-time collaborators” – Daszak also staunchly defended his associate, stating she “leads a world-class lab of the highest standards,” and rubbished allegations she or her organization were in any way responsible for covid’s spread».
From 2014 to 2019, Daszak worked with Zhengli on investigating and cataloging bat coronaviruses across China, an initiative funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) to the tune of $3.7 million. Thereafter, the EcoHealth chief transferred this effort to the University of North Carolina, where he began ‘gain-of-function’ research on coronaviruses and chimeras in humanized mice.
In a December 2019 interview, he somewhat ominously told virologist Vincent Racaniello that some coronaviruses may “get into human cells,” one can “manipulate in the lab pretty easily,” are untreatable with antibodies, and “you can’t vaccinate against them with a vaccine.”
«NIH withdrew its backing for the EcoHealth project in April 2020 under pressure from the Trump administration, a move that garnered significant sympathetic media attention for the organisation, and Daszak. The move was reversed to much fanfare in August, and EcoHealth’s funding more than doubled to $7.5 million – remembers the German investigative journalist – However, what no media outlet noted at any stage was the non-profit’s NIH support represents a negligible fraction of its US government income. The overwhelming majority of EcoHealth’s revenue, accounting for almost $40 million between 2013 and 2020, flows from the Department of Defense (DoD)».
THE PENTAGON AGENCY AND SUPERVIRUSES
A State Department factsheet on WIV published in January and quoted by Klarenberg notes that “several researchers” at the Institute became sick in autumn 2019, “before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses,” raising questions about the credibility of Zhengli’s claims that there was “zero infection” among WIV staff and students prior to the pandemic. The factsheet also asserted that “scientists in China have researched animal-derived coronaviruses under conditions that increased the risk for accidental and potentially unwitting exposure,” and “secret Chinese military projects” may have been conducted at the Institute since at least 2017.
«Perhaps predictably, there was no mention that the US military may have funded, whether directly or indirectly, projects conducted at WIV. It’s notable that $34.6 million of EcoHealth’s DoD funding came from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, a Pentagon division working to “counter and deter weapons of mass destruction and improvised threat networks”» remarked the journalist on RT.
We must not forget that the DTRA agency controls at least 25 bacteriological laboratories around the world, secreted by diplomatic immunity and the CIA, especially in the countries of the former Soviet Union such as Georgia and Ukraine where the coup revolutions financed by the Hungarian pultarch took place. American George Soros and the USA, through the government agency USAID which is considered a financial tool of the CIA for regime-change. But USAID also funded supervirus research in China and the US as part of Obama’s PREDICT 2 Coronavirus project just when Haines was deputy director of counterintelligence at Langley (CIA headquarters in Virginia).
One of these biolabs, the Lugar Center near Tbilisi, has been accused by Russia of developing dangerous bacteriological weapons experiments after a death in human guinea pigs during clinical trials conducted on a drug of the multinational pharmaceutical company Gilead, contractor of the Pentagon, which has enriched in the Covid-19 emergency through the anti-inflammatory Remdesivir, of which the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the first to acquire the patent for its production in China.
Despite these intrigues behind the chimeric superviruses, Daszak, as confirmed by the emails, convinced 27 other colleagues to immediately deny the origin of SARS-Cov-2 from the laboratory, although Gospa News has since unveiled numerous research on recombinant viruses since 2004 , created from the 2003 SARS strains infected with HIV / AIDS, the presence of which was identified in SARSCov-2 by studies of Indian biologists, virologist Luc Montagnier and bioengineer Pierre Bricage.
«The letter’s publication was highly significant, as it publicly cemented the notion of a scientific consensus around covid’s origins. This ‘consensus’ emerged shortly after a draft genome of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 had been released for analysis» Russia Today recalls.
MIT’S REVIEW WROTE ABOUT ARTIFICIAL VIRUS
As Charles Schmidt observed on March 18 on MIT’s Technology Review, numerous scientists who’d begun studying the draft were surprised by what they found. Among them was Nikolai Petrovsky, a highly-regarded professor at Australia’s Flinders University and chair of Vaxine, a company that develops immunizations for infectious diseases, which since 2005 has received millions in NIH funding.
«[Computer modeling] generated a startling result: the spike proteins studding SARS-CoV-2 bound more tightly to their human cell receptor, a protein called ACE2, than target receptors on any other species evaluated. In other words, SARS-CoV-2 was surprisingly well adapted to its human prey, which is unusual for a newly emerging pathogen» Technology Review records.
Petrovsky and his associates immediately set about writing a speculative paper asking whether the virus was “completely natural” or had originated from “a recombination event that occurred inadvertently or intentionally in a laboratory handling coronaviruses.”
As Technology Review notes, it had become “career suicide for scientists to voice suspicions about a possible lab leak,” and the community was “unwilling to challenge the orthodoxy” as a result.
«But Petrovsky struggled to find a publisher, with at least one open access repository rejecting his work outright. It wasn’t until May 2020 that the paper was finally released, and by that time suggestions of a lab leak had been comprehensively discredited – not least due to Trump’s pronouncements on the matter having made the issue political. In turn, it was virtually impossible for journalists to write credible stories questioning covid’s origins without being branded Trump apologists, conspiracy theorists, or worse» concluded Klarenberg.
Now pandemic prophet Avril Haines, head of the US Intelligence Community, has also begun to make a timid admission that SARS-Cov-2 may have been created in a laboratory. But on the strength of his past in the CIA, sooner or later he will have to explain what he knows about a pandemic planned for decades that contributed to the electoral success of President Biden, funded by Pfizer, among the first to produce the anti-Covid vaccine, which entered in the Big Pharma cartel created by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation on September 30 to support the WHO immunization plan in poor countries called COVAX, managed by the NGO Gavi di Gates and administered by a former GSK manager, a multinational that controls the Pfizer’s pharmaceutical sales network. It is therefore not surprising to know that Biden has financed COVAX with 4 million dollars, thus returning to Gates’ Big Pharma even much more than what he received in the election campaign …
read more… on Pentagon’s underskin microchip for Covid
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
© COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS
no reproduction without authorization – Versione originale in Italiano
MAIN SOURCES
CNN – AVRIL HAINES DNI REVELATIONRUSSIA TODAY – US INTELLIGENCE ON MANMADE VIRUS’ THEORYUS STATE DEPARTMENT – FACTSHEET ON COVIDMIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW – DID CORONAVIRUS LEAK FROM A LAB?
Un pensiero su “WUHAN-GATES – 36. “SARS-Cov-2 Laboratory Accident?”. Us Intelligence and MIT Review validated Manmade Virus’ Theory”