ZELENSKY Incessant Asking US NUKES! Pentagon Refuses to rule out Nuclear Weapons for Ukraine
8.092 Views
by Carlo Domenico Cristofori
The final decision on whether to provide nukes to Ukraine rests with US President
The final decision on whether to provide nuclear weapons to Ukraine rests with US President Donald Trump, and the possibility of such a move has not been ruled out, Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth has stated in an interview with Breitbart published on Thursday.
The issue has been raised by Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky, who has argued that Ukraine must either be fast-tracked into NATO or given more weaponry as a security guarantee in case of a potential peace deal. Hegseth has described Kiev’s ambitions to recover its 2014 borders as “unrealistic,” saying Ukraine should prepare for a negotiated peace, potentially supported by international troops.
The US Defense Secretary, clarified that his remarks should not be construed as ultimatums, but that they reflect “realism,” and that it is ultimately up to Trump to decide on the matter.
“I’m not the one that declares a red line or not. I work with the president, as we work through these issues, but we believed that it was useful just to speak some reality into the conversation,” he said. “Ultimately, President Trump is the only one who’s going to determine if there’s wiggle room or movement on any particular position.”
On Friday, Trump backed his defense secretary’s comments that Kiev must accept the reality that returning to pre-2014 borders is not feasible, and that its NATO membership is off the table.
But as we saw in our previous investigation, thanks to an international agreement signed by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer with former President Joseph Biden, the US could find itself in the unpleasant situation of having to supply nuclear warheads to London’s allies who could then easily pass them on to Ukrainian President Zelensky.
The US president has repeatedly blamed the Ukraine conflict on his predecessor Joe Biden’s support for Kiev’s NATO ambitions, claiming the hostilities would never have broken out under his leadership.
He reiterated this view following a lengthy phone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday – marking the first confirmed contact between the country’s leaders since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022.
Zelensky, whom Trump called the same day, after his talk with Putin, later told reporters it was “not pleasant” that Kiev had not been contacted first, but described his own conversation with Trump as a “really good discussion.”
Hegseth has dismissed claims that Trump’s engagement with Russia was a sign of weakness. “The reason Vladimir Putin and Zelensky are at the table is because of President Trump’s strength, because of American strength,” he asserted, noting “It didn’t happen under Joe Biden. It didn’t happen for years.”
The US president has said he understands Russia’s concerns about Ukraine joining NATO and that Kiev would not become part of the bloc under any settlement.
Moscow has consistently opposed Ukraine’s NATO ambitions, citing the bloc’s eastward expansion as a threat to national security and describing it as a key factor behind the ongoing conflict. The Kremlin has insisted that Ukraine must adopt a neutral status as part of any future peace agreement. At the same time, Putin has also said that Moscow cannot sign a deal with Zelensky, arguing that he no longer has legitimacy as the country’s leader.
Moscow has also strongly condemned Zelensky’s statements on obtaining nuclear weapons, with Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova warning that such rhetoric exposes him as “a maniac, who considers the planet as an object for his sick delusions.”
Zelensky, UK and EU Could Try to Sabotage Putin-Trump Ukraine Peace
The Putin-Trump phone call has sparked an outcry on both sides of the Atlantic among officials looking to keep the conflict going forever. What forces could bring their resources to bear to stop peace?
Has the most to lose, facing not only the cutoff of easy-to-embezzleWestern aid, but potential assassination by the neo-Nazi thugs helping keep his regime afloat.
Zelensky could sabotage peace by: a) rejecting Trump’s orders b) making a deal for support from other NATO powers c) staging a false flag provocation to justify keeping the conflict going, something already done successfully in the spring of 2022 to bolster Western support.
Arguably more heavily invested in the Ukraine project than the US, and the main beneficiaries of the 2014 Maidan coup, EU countries and the UK could take over US commitments. This would cost Europe $3.1 trln over 10 years, per a new assessment by Bloomberg Economics.
US Congress and Deep State Role on Ukraine Military Aids
Without Congressional support, Trump won’t be able to lift Russia sanctions, nor fully halt money and arms being sent to Ukraine.
Only Congress can approve or block new aid packages. If Democrats and even a handful of hawkish Republicans (of whom there are plenty) teamed up, Trump’s plans to bring pressure to bear on Kiev could be frustrated. The president does have veto power over Congressional funding, which would require a two-thirds majority to overcome -something unlikely in a Congress now filled with more MAGA Republicans than ever.
After Trump’s election in 2016, elements of the deep state, ranging from the intelligence community and State Department to top officials like Mike Pompeo and John Bolton successfully sabotaged his agenda, including Trump’s desire to improve relations with Russia.
In his first term, Trump 1.0 ended up not only ramping up anti-Russian sanctions and joined the diplomatic expulsion wars, but approved arms aid for Ukraine in 2017.
The deep state has its own ideas about the ‘right’ trajectory for US foreign policy.
Kremlin takes note of Vance’s rebuttal of claims regarding US troops in Ukraine
The Kremlin has acknowledged US Vice President JD Vance’s statements asserting that The Wall Street Journal misrepresented his remarks about the potential deployment of US military forces to Ukraine, Russian Presidential Spokesman Dmitry Peskov told TASS.
“Yes, we have taken note of it,” the Kremlin spokesman responded when asked about the issue.
As the WSJ previously reported, Vance said in an interview that the option of sending the US military to Ukraine “remains under consideration” by Washington in case Moscow refuses to resolve the conflict in good faith. According to the story, Vance stated that the United States might use economic and military leverage against Russia.
LOBBYIST of BIG PHARMA & WEAPONS as WHITE HOUSE Staff Chief. Trump’s First Step into NWO Hell
Peskov, commenting later on the article, called Vance’s threats about sending the US military to Ukraine and anti-Russian sanctions new elements of the US position that need to be clarified during the upcoming contacts.
MAIN SOURCE
RELATED TOPICS
(Visited 109 times, 1 visits today)
Starmer is a zionist first, and Brit 2nd. He wants to open up a 100 year annuity stream @ GBP3Bn per year, to Ukraine so that…..Ukraine can BUY UK politicians with that money for 100 years, and get still more money with the lobbying! We’ve “SEEN” this business model before, elsewhere. Ask the rothschilds.
Thanks for your clever comment