WUHAN-GATES – 77. NIH, Fauci’s US Institute & EU are PAYING Scientists to HIDE SARS-Cov-2 Man-Made BioWeapon
In the cover Cover image: Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates in front of the National Institute of Health in 2018
by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
They’re trying again!
At the dawn of a new Covid alarm, especially in Europe, aimed at imposing the vaccine passport that 9 EU states are already experimenting with and therefore the consequent health dictatorship for a democracy based on dangerous vaccines, here is the European Commission, the American National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases formerly directed by Anthony Fauci, and a charity partner of Bill Gates’ NGOs have financed a study to deny the laboratory origin of SARS-Cov-2 and accredit the natural origin now refuted by dozens of virological researches and even by the US Congress and various federal intelligence agencies.
In the distant January 2020, when the Covid virus began to claim victims in its first highly lethal strain from Wuhan that not coincidentally hit mainly China, Italy and Iran, I began to read Virology.org, a specialized global site, and from there I learned to decipher the language of scientific studies that allowed me to write the 76 investigations of the Wuhan-Gates cycle (82 in Italian version) partially summarized in the book of the same name that will soon be summarized in another essay.
After having read about 300-400 both on the origin of the SARS-Cov-23 bio-weapon and on the dangerousness of mRNA gene serums inherent in the toxic Spike protein enhanced in the laboratory, I developed the cunning to evaluate the reliability of a research on the basis of its financiers to verify potential conflicts of interest.
Most of the studies that defend the efficacy and safety of Covid vaccines are clearly epistemologically flawed precisely because they are directly sponsored by the Big Pharma manufacturers or conducted by doctors who have been or still are researchers, among these the striking case is that of an Italian oncologist who became an advisor to the Italian Minister of Health Orazio Schillaci.
This is why after reading how the mainstream media relaunched the new study that hypothesizes the species suspected of its transmission to humans, the first thing I did was look at who the financiers were…
These are precisely the subjects who collaborated with the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology and other American, Canadian, English and European laboratories that modified the 2003 SARS virus (acronym for Severe acute respiratory syndrome in English) by infecting it with HIV plasmids, the pathogenic agent of AIDS, of which we even published a microscopic photo (below) taken from one of the hundreds of researches aimed at finding a vaccine against this sexual disease.
The new study whose first signatory is Alexander Crits-Cristoph of the Institut d’Écologie et des Sciences de l’Environnement (IEES-Paris, UMR 7618), CNRS, Sorbonne Université, UPEC, IRD, INRAE, Paris) was published on September 13 in CELL and Science Direct after review and is titled “Genetic tracing of market wildlife and viruses at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic”.
Before finding out who paid for it, we point out that the website The Defender of the association Children’s Health Defense of Robert F. Kennedy jr. has already published the news that 21 world-renowned scientists have asked the journal to withdraw the study with a letter that we publish below and will summarize later.
For the sake of brevity, we cannot analyze all the multiple conflicts of interest of the scientists who conducted it and the institutions that contributed to the project, but only those most suspected of having contributed to the construction of SARS-COV-2 in the laboratory. They therefore have every interest in denying the artificial origin in favor of the natural one.
Under the heading “Acknowledgments” in the notes, we read (in brackets are the initials of the names of the researchers who received the individual contributions):
«This project has been funded in part with federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (contract no. 75N93021C00015 to M.W.). This work was partially supported through US National Institutes of Health grants U19 AI135995 (K.G.A., R.F.G., and M.A.S.), U01 AI151812 (K.G.A. and R.F.G.), R01 AI153044 (M.A.S., P.L., and A.R.), R01 AI135992 (J.O.W.), and 5T32AI007244-38 (J.I.L.); EU commission H2020 programme grant number 874735 (M.P.G.K.); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through MOSTMICRO-ITQB (UIDB/04612/2020 and UIDP/04612/2020, Z.H.) and LS4FUTURE (LA/P/0087/2020, Z.H.); Wellcome Trust (Collaborators Award 206298/Z/17/Z, ARTIC network) (M.A.S., P.L., and A.R.); European Research Council (grant agreement no. 725422 – ReservoirDOCS) (M.A.S., P.L., and A.R.); National Institutes of Health (T15LM011271; J.E.P.); the UC San Diego Merkin Fellowship (J.E.P.); National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (GNT2017197, E.C.H.); UK Medical Research Council (MRC, MC_UU_12014/12, MC_UU_00034/5, and MR/V01157X/1, D.L.R.); AIR@InnoHK administered by the Innovation and Technology Commission, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (E.C.H.); European Union Horizon 2020 (project MOOD, grant agreement no 874850, P.L.); Research Foundation – Flanders (G0D5117N and G051322N, P.L.); the Canadian Institutes of Health Research as part of the Coronavirus Variants Rapid Response Network (CoVaRR-Net; CIHR FRN#175622; A.L.R. and R.S.); and the Canada Foundation for Innovation – Major Science Initiatives Fund and the Government of Saskatchewan through Innovation Saskatchewan and the Ministry of Agriculture (A.L.R., R.S., and M.B.R.)».
The Role of Study Funders in Dangerous SARS Experiments
Let’s schematically analyze the roles played by these entities in the dangerous research on SARS viruses infected with HIV, especially in the laboratories of the Wuhan Institute of Virology (hereinafter also WIV) and in those of Chapel Hill of the University of North Carolina of Professor Ralph Baric who, thanks to the virologist Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) until December 2022 and supervisor of all research on coronaviruses conducted by the 28 American laboratories, and thanks to the funding of the Pentagon’s military agency DARPA and Moderna, the Big Pharma of Cambridge (Massachusetts) also financed by Bill Gates who patented a vaccine against Covid 9 months before the epidemic broke out.
Since 2000, Professor Baric, thanks to the contributions of Fauci’s DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) NIAID, began to play with coronaviruses so much that both the American patent expert David Martin and the commander of the military bacteriological sector of the Russian Army Igor Kirillov believe that even the 2003 SARS was created in the laboratory.
A thesis that increases the mystery of the premature death of the Italian microbiologist Carlo Urbani who was the first to isolate this pathogen.
In 2004, the European Commission chaired by Romano Prodi and also composed of Mario Monti financed the WIV institute with the EPISARS project and the first very dangerous experiments of the Chinese doctor Shi Zhengli, nicknamed “bat-woman” for her studies on the coronaviruses of horseshoe bats, in one of which she infected a SARS molecule with an HIV plasmid (small circular DNA filaments), then enhancing the virulence of the pathogen with the Gain of Function (GOF) technique for many years.
A French scientist, Jean-Claude Manuguerra, was sent to supervise the research, whom the director of the WHO, Gates’ puppet, then had the audacity to nominate in the inconclusive commission on the origins of SARS-COV-2.
The Wuhan research, funded by Fauci’s NIAID and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through the EchoHealhAlliance as part of the Predict projects promoted by the Obama-Biden administration and supervised abroad also by the counterespionage of the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) as in Ukraine and Georgia, continued despite Obama’s 2014 moratorium on the dangerous GOF technique, used by Fauci himself also in recent years as denounced by some senators of the US Congress just before the appearance of the Omicron variant, also believed to be of artificial origin.
The European Commission’s Horizon project is instead the one that sponsored research on new mRNA vaccines also with the use of graphene conducted by various Italian researchers including Ilaria Capua, former deputy of Monti’s party and previously entangled in a nasty investigation on the avian flu virus from which she emerged completely acquitted after receiving the parliamentary mandate.
In January 2022, the Wellcome Trust and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation each pledged $150 million for a total of $300 million to the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), a global partnership launched seven years ago this week by the governments of Norway, Germany, Japan and India, the Gates Foundation, Wellcome and the World Economic Forum.
The pledges came ahead of a global replenishment conference in March to support CEPI’s visionary five-year plan to better prepare for, prevent and equitably respond to future epidemics and pandemics.
Both the United Kingdom and Canada have in turn found themselves at the center of very serious suspicions about the manipulation of coronaviruses for the top secret research conducted by the Pirbright Institute thanks to funding from the Gates Foundation and the American military agency DARPA (after the rejection in 2018 of the Defuse project in the USA by President Trump because it was too dangerous), and at the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in Winnipeg, Manitoba, of which Frank Plummer was director before he died suddenly and mysteriously in Africa in February 2020 just when the Covid epidemic broke out.
It should also be remembered that the President of the European Commission Ursula Von der Leyen was reconfirmed in her role despite being under investigation by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office EPPO for the shady purchases of Covid vaccines from Pfizer of her friend Albert Bourla but was instead rewarded by the Gates Foundation for having donated them to the Covax project carried out by her NGOs Gavi Alliance and CEPI.
The Signatory Scientists Discovered by the US Congress to be Concealing SARS-Cov-2 from the Laboratory
Among the researchers who signed the new study on the natural origins of SARS-Cov-2 there are two doctors about whom we had already written because their names ended up at the attention of the US Congress among those who tried to conceal since February 2020 the clues that confirmed the artificial origin: these are Robert F. Garry, professor at the School of Medicine of Tulane University, and Christian G. Andersen, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, San Diego, California USA, Edward C. Holmes, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
As we highlighted in the Wuhan-Gates 72 investigation, a summary of the previous ones, from the US Congressional hearings it emerged «that Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, Jeremy Farrar – previously at the Wellcome Trust, now the chief scientist at the W.H.O. – Kristian Andersen, PhD. at Scripps, Dr. Edwin Holmes in Sydney, Dr. Peter Daszak at the EcoHealth Alliance, all conspired in January of 2020 to cover up what they knew. Namely, that the virus was engineered in a joint US-Chinese collaboration in the lab in Wuhan, China».
The most striking was the email Dr. Garry wrote before he changed his mind under pressure from Fauci:
«I really can’t think of a plausible natural scenario where you get from the bat virus or one very similar to it to nCoV where you insert exactly 4 amino acids 12 nucleotide that all have to be added at the exact same time to gain this function – that and you don’t change any other amino acid in S2? I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature. Do the alignment of the spikes at the amino acid level – its stunning. Of course, in the lab it would be easy to generate the perfect 12 base insert that you wanted».
The Conclusions of the New Research on Suspected Animals
Now that we have revealed who funded the study and who some of the signatories are, we can report, for completeness of information, the summary of the same.
«Zoonotic spillovers of viruses have occurred through the animal trade worldwide. The start of the COVID-19 pandemic was traced epidemiologically to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. Here, we analyze environmental qPCR and sequencing data collected in the Huanan market in early 2020».
«We demonstrate that market-linked severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genetic diversity is consistent with market emergence and find increased SARS-CoV-2 positivity near and within a wildlife stall. We identify wildlife DNA in all SARS-CoV-2-positive samples from this stall, including species such as civets, bamboo rats, and raccoon dogs, previously identified as possible intermediate hosts».
«We also detect animal viruses that infect raccoon dogs, civets, and bamboo rats. Combining metagenomic and phylogenetic approaches, we recover genotypes of market animals and compare them with those from farms and other markets. This analysis provides the genetic basis for a shortlist of potential intermediate hosts of SARS-CoV-2 to prioritize for serological and viral sampling».
Conclusions completely opposite to those of a group of virologists, including the Italian Giorgio Palù, who discovered the affinity of the SARS-Cov-2 genome with that of an artificial human gene created in the laboratory by Moderna and believed that there was a 1 in 30 billion chance, or practically zero, that a natural zoonotic mutation of the virus had occurred.
21 University Scientists Slam Study’s “Invalid” Conclusions
The paper was destroyed in a letter signed by 21 scientists, including Richard Ebright, Ph.D., a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, an outspoken critic of the Gain of Function research, who told The Defender, “The paper presents no new data or new analyses and draws invalid conclusions.”
It was also signed by Jay Bhattacharya, M.D., Ph.D., Professor of Health Policy at Stanford University.
Here is the conclusion of the letter: “Crits-Christoph et al. 2024 has invalid premises, invalid conclusions, and may be the product of scientific misconduct. We urge Cell to issue an editorial expression of concern for this article and to initiate an investigation of this article for possible retraction.” (the whole letter below among the sources).
The text also contains ample reference to the vile attempts to deny the laboratory origin of SARS-Cov-2 by scientists who ended up in the eye of the storm together with Fauci who, precisely to avoid committing perjury, in one of the last hearings was the first to admit the possibility of the artificial origin of the virus.
The publication of this new study aims to delegitimize any previous research on the laboratory origin that was denounced in advance by French scientists Luc Montagnier, the late virologist and Nobel Prize winner for Medicine, Jean-Claude Perez, former IBM biomathematician, and Pierre Bricage, academic professor of bio-engineering and NATO consultant, who were the first to confirm the anomalous presence of four HIV amino acids within the SARS-COV-2 genome.
The attempt by Gates’ global immunization gang can still have space in Europe because there are still ignorant journalists and bloggers who deny the existence of the Covid virus, its lethality and even its isolation.
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
© COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS
prohibition of reproduction without authorization
follow Fabio Carisio Gospa News director on Twitter
follow Gospa News on Telegram
MAIN SOURCES
CELL – Genetic tracing of market wildlife and viruses at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic
RELATED TOPICS
Every article in Italian can be read in English thanks to machine translation available
WUHAN.GATES – 34. COVID IS A SCIENTIST’s KILLER… Who Discovered SARS Viruses Died!
https://www.gospanews.net/en/2024/04/25/h5n1-avian-flu-nightmare-samples-in-the-us-consumer-milk-may-be-disease-x-after-fauci-dangerous-experiments/
