UN SG Hammarskjold Killed Twice by DEEP STATE. UK Intel Hinders the International Inquiry
by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
VERSIONE ORIGINALE IN ITALIANO
Dag Hammarskjold, the former UN Secretary who passed away 58 years ago in a plane crash that has become increasingly suspicious of any declassification of documents, was killed a second time a few days ago. Today as then, the killer is the phantom and notorious Deep State, the world potentate between politics, high finance, masonry and obviously military intelligence.
According to numerous journalistic investigations and even recent international inquiry it seems now clear that the disaster that occurred on September 18, 1961 in southern Africa in which he died with 15 other people was caused by an attack.
UKRAINEGATE, CIA-DEEP STATE’S PLOT AGAINST TRUMP with two whistleblowers and Italian ties
Those who killed him at the time have not yet found out why for over half a century the truth has been sidetracked, hidden and covered up with the usual response of the secret services to the UN’s investigator’s request for documents: “classified – top secret – reserved – undisclosed “.
Today those who have virtually killed the memory of Hammarskjold by placing a granite gravestone on the possible discovery of the truth have a name and a face instead: their name is Elizabeth Denham, since 2016 Information Commissioner Office (ICO) of the United Kingdom who can boast the authoritative CBE title, Commander of (the Order of) the British Empire, received by Queen Elizabeth in 2018.
ICO is the high commissioner of the “very” democratic United Kingdom which must determine whether there are reasons to keep classified documents secret that British intelligence does not intend to unseal before the legitimate requests of promoters of authoritative and accredited international investigations such as United Nation Association Westminster. This is the London section of a NGO legally recognized as a UN partner that has focused the last years of its activity on the massacre that took place in Ndola, in the then Belgian Congo today Zambia.
Well, on May 28 the President of Westminster UNA David Wardrop published a disturbing update in which he communicates that with a sentence issued in that month the ICO declared that «concluded in respect of one of the five exemptions under the Act that the FCO had cited, that “by a relatively narrow margin the public interest favours maintaining the exemption”» espressed by UK’s Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO).
In practice, he gives reason to FCO, the British national institution responsible for assessing the need for secrecy of Intelligence acts, which previously «claimed it had already shared all it knows (response, UK Permanent Representative, 10 June 2015) but refused to extend that assurance to the records of MI5, MI6, and GCHQ, all operating in or around the Congo at the time of the plane crash».
The maintenance of the exemption authorizes it to keep the files well kept in the safes of the intelligence of Her Majesty that just in these days, through the mouth of the ex MI6 chief Richard Dearlove has instead confirmed that the SARS-CoV-2 virus of the mortal pandemic was built in the laboratory as demonstrated by Gospa News’s 12 WuhanGates reports.
The detailed narration of the facts in all their technical and bureaucratic folds is left to the official press release of Professor Wardrop, expert in diplomacy, geopolitics and intelligence and speaker at the famous Kings College London, which we report below. We try to get straight to the point.
Hammarskjold, a devout Lutheran Christian and loved by all his collaborators who with the help of the famous Franco-Russian painter Marc Chagall dedicated the artistic Peace Window to him inside the UN headquarters in New York, was going to Belgian Congo to settle a question concerning the “secession of Katanga, the prey of the Union Minière” for the rich underground deposits existing. That’s why his death is more suspicious than ever…
The refusal to open the archives of MI5 (internal intelligence), MI6 (foreign intelligence) and GCHQ (Government Communications Headquarters) the command of the British secret services, has been opposed to the association of Westminster, composed of independent jurists, since it intervened in support of Tanzanian judge Mohamed Chanda Othman, appointed by the United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres to shed light once and for all on the tragedy.
Nine countries first and then five others opened counter-espionage wardrobes to facilitate the investigation by the authoritative African magistrate. As already reported in the previous report on the death of the UN secretary «the official was tasked to report progress and obstacles encountered before October 2018, after which the UN would prepare a new report. All countries responded except the UK which neither even acknowledged the UN’s request, nor the follow-up from the UN Secretary-General» recalled Wardrop in his note.
USTICA MASSACRE: THE NATO SHADES ON US – FRENCH AIR FIGHTERS
In the overflowing statement of bitterness and sadness, the President of Westminster UNA explains why they will not «appeal the Information Commissioner’s adverse decision even though public interest will be the loser», as in the cases of the massacre of the DC-9 Itavia in Ustica and the Malaysian flight in Ukraine.
The United Kingdom has not yet answered the heavy question raised by the journalist Maurin Picard, New York correspondent for Le Soir (Brussels) and Le Figaro (Paris), who most of all investigated the tragedy, then relaunched from the UNA website as from Gospa News.
«Great Britain needs to explain why the top diplomats in charge of Ndola refused to acknowledge the sudden disappearance of Albertina and turned off the airport lights. He also needs to explain what intelligence service activities they were doing that night near the airport» recalled Picard.
MALAYSIA FLY MASSACRE: UKRAINE FALSE-FLAG WITH NATO, 007 AND SOROS ONG
Given the complexity of the story, we refer to the reading of our previous report to understand all the background and anomalies in the midst of the mysteries still open such as the role of the Belgian mercenary pilots, the German plane Dornier 28, delivered weeks before the crash to the secessionist government of the Katangese, the location of a former Nazi night fighter pilot named Heinrich Schaefer, and the “lost” South African apartheid documents concerning a certain Celestial Operation, apparently designed to kill Hammarskjold.
Uncleared puzzles that include the disconcerting confessions of two American employees of the National Security Agency, now deceased, who, by their listening stations, accidentally heard an air attack against Albertina and reported it to the White House.
Now, however, UNA Westiminster also renounces being a thorn in the side of British Intelligence to try to bring out the truth and in fact delivers the victory to the Deep State which always relies precisely on bureaucracy, oppressive even for the most motivated opponents, and on time which fades the memories of intrigues and plots.
Here is President David Wardrop’s explanation: «Knowing all this, why are we not appealing the Commissioner’s judgement? Firstly, because our government’s performance can be clearly judged against that of Russia, Zimbabwe, the D.R.C, Angola and other UN Member States. Such exposure to international scrutiny shames us as a nation».
«Secondly, as a small organisation, we cannot match the power of a battery of State-funded lawyers. However, we will continue to support the hammarskjöldinquiry information service which sets out to report the progress of the continuing UN inquiry and associated developments».
“THE UN SECRETARY GENERAL KILLING”: AFTER 58 YEARS THE BRITISH 007 CONCEAL THE DOSSIER
We have a well-founded fear that there will be few further sensational news given that the rubber wall of British intelligence has placed a boulder in front of the tomb where the truth was buried.
Gospa News will however try to support UNA Westminster and the cause of Hammarskjold not only by highlighting any new developments of the UN investigation, an organization more impotent than ever in the face of the most shady international affairs, but by periodically publishing the photo of Commissioner ICO alongside that of the UN secretary who passed away: killed by a military Deep State‘s plot first and then by a bureaucratic one.
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
© COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS
no reproduction without authorization – original italian version
MAIN SOURCES
GOSPA NEWS – OSINT INVESTIGATIONS
GOSPA NEWS – WUGAN-GATES INVESTIGATIONS
THE INTEGRAL PRESS RELEASE OF UNA WESTMINSTER
David Wardrop is Chairman of the Westminster United Nations Association which hosts the hammarskjoldinquiry.info website which has posted informed updates on the Hammarskjöld Inquiry process since 2014.28 May – Dag Hammarskjöld’s death: Westminster UNA Chairman explains why we will not appeal the Information Commissioner’s adverse decision even though public interest will be the loser
Dag Hammarskjöld’s death: Westminster UNA Chairman explains why we will not appeal the Information Commissioner’s adverse decision even though public interest will be the loser
This COVID-free story has three parts and a coda summarised in its title. Firstly, whilst the current UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres seeks unity amongst the Security Council’s Permanent Members in this new 21st century challenge, and not re-kindle one from the previous century, the fate of his predecessor Dag Hammarskjöld who died in a plane crash in 1961 while seeking to bring peace to the Congo has continued to puzzle us over these near sixty years.
The incident puzzled the UN General Assembly at the time. It agreed to leave the inquiry verdict open pending further data. Fifty years later, analysis of much of that needed data prompted the UN to re-open the inquiry which then took evidence from eyewitnesses and experts, diplomats, and governments. Well, from many governments but not the UK. Why?
The UK’s Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO) claimed it had already shared all it knows (response, UK Permanent Representative, 10 June 2015) but refused to extend that assurance to the records of MI5, MI6, and GCHQ, all operating in or around the Congo at the time of the plane crash. The UN’s inquiry team suspected that some other countries were being similarly coy. In May 2018, the UN asked initially nine countries (adding five later) to grant access to all relevant records, including security and intelligence records, to an ‘independent and high-ranking official’ which the countries would appoint.
The official was tasked to report progress and obstacles encountered before October 2018, after which the UN would prepare a new report. All countries responded except the UK which neither even acknowledged the UN’s request, nor the follow-up from the UN Secretary-General. Only when the closing date for responses had passed did it reply, stating that it would not appoint anyone to the role, although some months later it did do so. How could the UK act this way, at the time it claims to be establishing a new post-Brexit, Global Britain identity? If it had nothing to hide, as claimed in 2015, why that delay?
So, to the story’s second part. In March 2019, we submitted a Freedom of Information Request seeking records documenting the FCO’s decision. Its initial response, refusing to provide the information, rested on its narrow interpretation of the Freedom of Information Act, much of which we rejected as we did its second response. We appealed the matter to the Information Commissioner, arguing that public interest arguments weighed in favour of disclosure.
After acknowledging similar difficulty extracting information from the FCO, the Information Commissioner relayed her judgement in May 2020. She ‘accept(ed) that there is a clear public interest in understanding more about the decision-making process’, noting ‘potential consequences on the UK’s relationship with the UN’ but concluded in respect of one of the five exemptions under the Act that the FCO had cited, that ‘by a relatively narrow margin the public interest favours maintaining the exemption.’ Is that the end of it?
Not quite, and so to the third part. In assessing the public interest, the Information Commissioner has taken a very narrow interpretation of the public interest, under that and one other exemption. However, the FOI Act requires government departments, and the Information Commissioner in deciding appeals, to consider “all the circumstances of the case” in assessing the public interest. The Information Commissioner did not look at all of the circumstances.
There is a powerful public interest in knowing why the UK was alone in failing to acknowledge both the UN’s initial request for cooperation and the Secretary-General’s personal follow-up, or even the timing of its appointment of an independent and high ranking individual, a full seven months after the UN commenced preparing its report. There is a public interest in knowing why the FCO adopted such an unhelpful, even cynical approach, and those public interests should have been properly weighed by the Information Commissioner.
So, to the coda. Knowing all this, why are we not appealing the Commissioner’s judgement? Firstly, because our government’s performance can be clearly judged against that of Russia, Zimbabwe, the D.R.C, Angola and other UN Member States. Such exposure to international scrutiny shames us as a nation. Secondly, as a small organisation, we cannot match the power of a battery of State-funded lawyers. However, we will continue to support the hammarskjöldinquiry information service which sets out to report the progress of the continuing UN inquiry and associated developments.
David Wardrop is Chairman of the Westminster United Nations Association which hosts the hammarskjoldinquiry.info website which has posted informed updates on the Hammarskjöld Inquiry process since 2014.
8 pensieri su “UN SG Hammarskjold Killed Twice by DEEP STATE. UK Intel Hinders the International Inquiry”